We Tested 5 AI Detectors on 100 Text Samples — Here's What We Found
Accuracy rates, false positives, and the finding that matters: 10 minutes of human editing breaks most detectors.
Guides and original tests from the team behind the free detector — including the limits of our own tool. No hype.
Accuracy rates, false positives, and the finding that matters: 10 minutes of human editing breaks most detectors.
The same 14 signals our detector checks — learn to spot them manually, with real examples.
When free is enough, when you should pay — and the privacy question nobody asks.
False-positive math, a fair-use protocol, and why the best detector is better assessment design.
What "87% AI" really claims, why 100% accuracy is impossible, and how to read scores like a pro.
The three big models have distinct writing fingerprints — and one fools detectors much better than the others.
Adding real voice and specifics to AI-assisted drafts — for legitimate writing aid, not deception.
Free detectors ranked by our testing — accuracy, privacy, and the fine print behind "free."
When rewording becomes plagiarism — with examples of patchwriting vs proper paraphrase.
Half your applicants used AI. Here's how to screen fairly without rejecting great candidates.